España S, Condori-Fernández N, González A, Pastor Ó (2009) Evaluating the completeness and granularity of functional requirements specifications: a controlled experiment. In: 17th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE’09), Atlanta, GA, USA. IEEE, New York, pp 161–170
Chapter
Google Scholar
Boehm B, McClean RK, Ufrig DB (1975) Some experience with automated aids to the design of large-scale reliable software. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 1(1):125–133
Article
Google Scholar
Wieringa RJ, Heerkens JMG (2004) Evaluating the structure of research papers: a case study. In: 2nd international workshop in comparative evaluation of requirements engineering, Kyoto, Japan. IEEE Press, New York, pp 41–50
Google Scholar
Wieringa RJ, Heerkens JMG (2006) The methodological soundness of requirements engineering papers: a conceptual framework and two case studies. Requir Eng 11(4):295–307
Article
Google Scholar
Höfer A, Tichy WF (2007) Status of empirical research in software engineering. In: Empirical software engineering issues. Critical assessment and future directions. LNCS, vol 4336. Springer, Berlin, pp 10–19
Chapter
Google Scholar
Iivari J, Kerola P (1983) A sociocybernetic framework for the feature analysis of information systems development methodologies. In: Olle TW, Sol HG, Tully CJ (eds) Information systems methodologies: a feature analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 87–139
Google Scholar
Dieste O, Lopez M, Ramos F (2008) Updating a systematic review about selection of software requirements specification techniques. In: 11th workshop on requirements engineering (WER 2008), Barcelona, Spain
Siau K, Rossi M (1998) Evaluation of information modeling methods—a review. In: 31st Hawaii international conference on systems science (HICSS 1998), Kohala Coast, USA, vol 5. IEEE, New York, pp 314–322
Google Scholar
Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wesslén A (2000) Experimentation in Software Engineering: an introduction. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Book
Google Scholar
Cockburn A (2000) Writing effective use cases. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Google Scholar
España S, González A, Pastor Ó (2009) Communication Analysis: a requirements elicitation approach for information systems. In: 21st international conference on advanced information systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. LNCS. Springer, Berlin
Google Scholar
Wieringa RJ (1996) Requirements engineering: frameworks for understanding. Wiley, New York
Google Scholar
Dobing B, Parsons J (2006) How UML is used. Commun ACM 49(5):109–113
Article
Google Scholar
Simons AJH (1999) Use cases considered harmful. In: Technology of object-oriented languages and systems, Nancy, France. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 194–203
Google Scholar
Dano B, Briand H, Barbier F (1997) A use case driven requirements engineering process. In: Third IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering (RE’97), Antapolis, MD. IEEE, New York
Google Scholar
Rolland C, Achour CB (1998) Guiding the construction of textual use case specifications. Data Knowl Eng J 25(1–2):125–160
Article
Google Scholar
Constantine LL, Lockwood LAD (1999) Software for use: a practical guide to the models and methods of usage-centered design. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Google Scholar
Cockburn A (1997) Structuring use cases with goals. J Object-Oriented Program
Phalp KT, Jonathan V, Cox K (2007) Improving the quality of use case descriptions: empirical assessment of writing guidelines. Softw Qual Control 15(4):383–399
Article
Google Scholar
Cox K, Phalp K, Shepperd M (2001) Comparing use case writing guidelines. In: 7th international workshop on requirements engineering: foundations for software quality (REFSQ’2001), Interlaken, Switzerland
Pastor O, González A, España S (2007) Conceptual alignment of software production methods. In: Conceptual modelling in information systems engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 209–228
Chapter
Google Scholar
González A, España S, Pastor O (2008) Towards a communicational perspective for enterprise information systems modelling. In: IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on the practice of enterprise modeling, Stockholm, Sweden. LNBIP. Springer, Berlin
Google Scholar
González A, España S, Pastor O (2009) Unity criteria for business process modelling: a theoretical argumentation for a software engineering recurrent problem. In: 3rd international conference on research challenges in information science (RCIS 2009), Fes, Morocco. IEEE, New York
Google Scholar
Moody DL (2003) The Method Evaluation Model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on information systems (ECIS 2003), Naples, Italy, 16–21 June 2003
Yadav SB, Bravoco RR, Chatfield AT, Rajkumar TM (1988) Comparison of analysis techniques for information requirement determination. Commun ACM 31(9):1090–1097
Article
Google Scholar
Lindland OI, Sindre G, Sølvberg A (1994) Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw 11(2):42–49
Article
Google Scholar
Moody DL, Sindre G, Brasethvik T, Solvberg A (2003) Evaluating the quality of information models: empirical testing of a conceptual model quality framework. In: 25th international conference on software engineering (ICSE 2003), Portland, USA, pp 295–305
Moody DL, Sindre G, Brasethvik T, Solvberg A (2002) Evaluating the quality of process models: empirical testing of a quality framework. In: 21st international conference on conceptual modeling. Springer, Berlin
Google Scholar
Larman C (1997) Applying UML and patterns. Prentice Hall, New York (see p 53)
Google Scholar
Övergaard G, Palmkvist K (2004) Use Cases: patterns and blueprints. Addison-Wesley, Reading (see Part V)
Google Scholar
Kulak D, Guiney E (2000) Use cases: requirements in context. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 94–95
Google Scholar
Langlois RN (2002) Modularity in technology and organization. J Econ Behav Organ 49(1):19–37
Article
Google Scholar
Reijers H, Mendling J (2008) Modularity in process models: review and effects. In: 6th international conference on business process management (BPM 2008), Milan, Italy. LNCS, vol 5240. Springer, Berlin, pp 20–35
Google Scholar
Rescher N (1977) Methodological pragmatism: systems-theoretic approach to the theory of knowledge. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Google Scholar
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003
Article
Google Scholar
Davis AM, Overmyer S, Jordan K, Caruso J, Dandashi F, Dinh A, Kincaid G, Ledeboer G, Reynolds P, Sitaram P, Ta A, Theofanos M (1993) Identifying and measuring quality in a software requirements specification. In: 1st international software metrics symposium, pp 141–152
Pohl K (1994) The three dimensions of requirements engineering: a framework and its applications. In: 5th international conference on advanced information systems engineering, Paris, France. Pergamon, New York
Google Scholar
Krogstie J, Sindre G, Jorgensen H (2006) Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur J Inf Syst 15(1):91–102
Article
Google Scholar
Falkenberg E, Hesse W, Lindgreeen P, Nilsson B, Oei JLH, Rolland C, Stamper RK, VanAssche F, Verrijn-Stuart A, Voss K (1998) FRISCO. A framework of information systems concepts. IFIP WG 8.1 report
Krogstie J, Lindland OI, Sindre G (1995) Towards a deeper understanding of quality in requirements engineering. In: 7th international conference on advanced information systems engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 82–95
Chapter
Google Scholar
Moody DL, Shanks GG (1994) What makes a good data model? Evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. In: 13th international conference on the entity-relationship approach, Manchester, UK. Springer, Berlin, pp 94–111
Google Scholar
Schuette R, Rotthowe T (1998) The guidelines of modeling—an approach to enhance the quality in information models. In: Conceptual modeling (ER’98), Singapore. LNCS, vol 1507. Springer, Berlin, pp 240–254
Google Scholar
Schuette R (1999) Architectures for evaluating the quality of information models—a meta and an object level comparison. In: 18th international conference on conceptual modeling (RE 1999). Springer, Berlin, pp 490–505
Google Scholar
Shanks GG, Darke P (1997) Quality in conceptual modelling: linking theory and practice. Asia-Pacific conference on information systems (PACIS 1007), Brisbane, pp 805–814
Moody DL (2005) Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl Eng 55(3):243–276
Article
MathSciNet
Google Scholar
Lockemann PC, Mayr HC (1986) Information system design: techniques and software support. Information processing, vol 86. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Google Scholar
Zave P, Jackson M (1997) Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 6(1):1–30
Article
Google Scholar
Jacobson I (2004) Use cases—yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Softw Syst Model 3(3):210–220
Article
Google Scholar
Kroll P (2004) Dr Process how many use cases should you have in a system? IBM Rational developerWorks documentation. Accessed 02-2009
Juristo N, Moreno A (2001) Basics of software engineering experimentation. Kluwer, Boston
Book
Google Scholar
Achour CB, Rolland C, Maiden NAM, Souveyet C (1999) Guiding use case authoring: results of an empirical study. In: IEEE symposium on requirements engineering. IEEE, Los Alamitos
Google Scholar
Cox K, Phalp K (2000) Replicating the CREWS use case authoring guidelines experiment. Empir Softw Eng 5(3):245–267
Article
Google Scholar
Anda B, Sjøberg DIK, Jørgensen M (2001) Quality and understandability of use case models. In: 15th European conference on object-oriented programming (ECOOP 2001). LNCS, vol 2072. Springer, Berlin, pp 402–428
Chapter
Google Scholar
Fortuna M, Werner C, Borges M (2007) Um modelo integrado de requisitos com casos de uso. In: Workshop de ingeniería de requisitos y ambientes software IDEAS 2007
Jacobson I (1987) Object-oriented development in an industrial environment. In: Conference on object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications, Orlando, FL, USA. ACM, New York, pp 183–191
Chapter
Google Scholar
OMG (2009) OMG unified modeling language (OMG UML), superstructure, V2.2. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/09-02-02. Accessed 02-2010
Basili V, Rombach HD (1988) The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 14(6):758–773
Article
Google Scholar
Garson D (1998) Scales and standard measures. North Carolina State University. Updated September 2008. http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/standard.htm
Runeson P (2003) Using students as experiment subjects—an analysis on graduate and freshmen student data. In: 7th international conference on empirical assessment in software engineering, pp 95–102