Skip to main content
Download PDF
/v1/supplement/title

Negotiating and enacting contracts for business networks

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society volume 13, pages 7–26 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Flexibility is a major issue in business today and one answer to that is to organize work in networks of companies rather than within a single business. Cooperation between organizations is more easily established and adapted than reorganization of internal company structures. But how do we manage flexibility in such a network without sacrificing the minimum stability that is required for economic success? We suggest a method for coordinating interaction in a business network that provides three levels of flexibility: local ad-hoc change, global negotiated change and planned change. This method is based on the negotiation and enactment of process-based interorganizational contracts.

References

  1. M. T. Hannan, J. H. Freeman, Organizational Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Alchian, H. Demsetz, Production, information costs and economic organization,American Economic Review 62(5): 777–795, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. C. Jensen, W. H. Meckling, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Ross, The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem,American Economic Review, 63(2): 134–139, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Wilson, The theory of syndicates,Econometrica, 36: 119–132, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. H. Coase, The nature of the firm,Economica 4: 386–405, 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Klein, R. Crawford, A. Alchian, Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process,Journal of Law and Economics 21: 297–326, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. E. Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies, Free Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. E. Williamson, The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes,Journal of Economic Literature, 19: 1537–1568, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. W. Malone, J. Yates, R. I. Benjamin, Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies,Communications of the ACM 30(6): 484–497, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. K. Clemons, S. P. Reddi, M. C. Row, The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The “Move to the Middle” Hypothesis,Journal of Management Information Systems 10(2): 9–35, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. P. Holland, A. G. Lockett, Mixed Mode Network Structures: The Strategic Use of Electronic Communication by Organizations,Organization Science 8(5): 475–488, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. J. Denning, R. Medina-Mora, Completing the Loops,Interfaces 25(3): 42–57, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Medina-Mora, T. Winograd, R. Flores, F. Flores, The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology. InProceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW’92, J. Turner, R. Kraut (Eds.), pages 281–288, ACM, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Winograd, F. Flores, Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. L. G. Dietz, Understanding and modeling business processes with DEMO. InProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling ER ’99, J. Akoka, M. Bouzeghoub, I. Comyn-Wattiau, E. Métais (Eds.), pages 188–202, Springer, Berlin, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. L. G. Dietz, N. Habing, The Notion of Business Process Revisited. InProceedings of the OTM Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE, R. Meersman, Z. Tari (Eds.), pages 85–100, Springer, Berlin, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Liu, L. Sun, J. Barjis, J. L. G. Dietz, Modelling dynamic behaviour of business organisations — extension of DEMO from a semiotic perspective,Knowledge-Based Systems, 16(2): 101–111, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Fox, The Challenge of Convergence. InProceedings of the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 485–492, 1995.

  21. D. L. Dean, R. E. Orwig, D. R. Vogel, Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools,Group Decision and Negotiation, 9: 109–127, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. R. Searle, Speech Acts — An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, London, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action 1 — Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Lehtinen, K. Lyytinen, An Action Based Model of Information Systems,Information Systems, 11(4): 299–317, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Goldkuhl, Generic business frameworks and action modelling. InCommunication Modeling — The Language/Action Perspective, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Communication Modeling, F. Dignum, J. Dietz, E. Verharen, H. Weigand (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Goldkuhl, M. Lind, Developing einteractions — A framework for business capabilities and exchanges. InProceedings of the 12th European Conference on Information Systems, 2004.

  28. G. Goldkuhl, A. Röstlinger, Joint elicitation of problems: An important aspect of change analysis. InHuman, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development, D. Avison, J. Kendall, J. Degross (Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  29. V. E. v. Reijswoud, PhD thesis, TU Delft (Delft), 1996.

  30. F. Köhne, M. Schoop, D. Staskiewicz, A Meta Model for Electronic Negotiations #x2014; Comparison of existing approaches. InProceedings of the 12th Research Symposium on Emerging Electronic Markets (RSEEM 2005) “Governance of Electronic Markets”, Y. H. Tan (Ed.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Bichler, A Roadmap to Auction-based Negotiation Protocols for Electronic Commerce. InProceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, page 6018, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Ströbel, C. Weinhardt, The Montreal Taxonomy for Electronic Negotiations,Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(2): 143–164, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Dignum, U. Cortés, Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce III. Springer, Berlin, 2001.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. D. K. W. Chiu, S. C. Cheung, S. Till, A Three-Layer Architecture for E-Contract Enforcement in an E-Service Environment. InProceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, page 74.1, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Ströbel, Design of Roles and Protocols for Electronic Negotiations,Electronic Commerce Research, 1(3): 335–353, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Schoop, C. Quix, DOC.COM: a framework for effective negotiation support in electronic marketplaces,Computer Networks, 37(2): 153–170, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. A. de Moor, H. Weigand, Business Negotiation Support: Theory and Practice,International Negotiation, 9(1): 31–57, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. G. E. Kersten, S. E. Strecker, K. P. Law, Protocols for Electronic Negotiation Systems: Theoretical Foundations and Design Issues. InE-Commerce and Web Technologies: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, ECWeb 2004, Zaragoza, Spain, August 31–September 3, 2004, K. Bauknecht, M. Bichler, B. Pröll (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. Mathieu, M.-H. Verrons, A generic model for contract negotiation. InAISB’02 Symposium on Intelligent Agents in Virtual Markets, The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London, 2002.

  40. M. Schoop, A. Jertila, T. List, Negoisst: a negotiation support system for electronic business-to-business negotiations in e-commerce,Data & Knowledge Engineering, 47(3): 371–401, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. W. M. P. v. d. Aalst, A. H. M. t. Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, A. P. Barros, Workflow Patterns,Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1): 5–51, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. W. M. P. v. d. Aalst, A. H. M. t. Hofstede, YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language,Information Systems, 30(4): 245–275, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. M. Bernauer, G. Kappel, G. Kramler, W. Retschitzegger, Specification of Interorganizational Workflows — A Comparison of Approaches. InProceedings of the 7th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2003), pages 30–36, 2003.

  44. G. M. Giaglis, R. J. Paul, V. Hlupic, Integrating Simulation in Organisational Design Studies,International Journal of Information Management 19(3): 219–236, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. V. Hlupic, S. Robinson, Business Process Modelling and Analysis Using Discrete-Event Simulation. InProceedings of 1998 the Winter Simulation Conference, D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, M. Manivannan, J. Carson (Eds.), The Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. J. Paul, G. M. Giaglis, V. Hlupic, Simulation of Business Processes,American Behavioral Scientist, 42(10): 1551–1576, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. J. Paul, A. Serrano, Simulation for Business Processes and Information Systems Design. InProceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, S. E. Chick, P. J. Sánchez, D. Ferrin, D. J. Morrice (Eds.), pages 1787–1796, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  48. R. J. Paul, A. Serrano, Collaborative Information Systems and Business Process Design Using Simulation. InProceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04), page 10009.1, 2004.

  49. J. H. Weyland, M. Engiles, Towards Simulation-based Business Process Management. InProceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference S. E. Chick, P. J. Sánchez, D. Ferrin, D. J. Morrice (Eds.), pages 225–227, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  50. C. Chandra, A. V. Smirnov, N. Chilov, Business Process Reengineering of Supply Chain Networks Through Simulation Modeling and Analysis. InProceedings of the Second International Conference on Simulation, Gaming, Training and Business Process Reengineering in Operations, pages 345–349, 2000.

  51. G. M. Giaglis, G. I. Doukidis, R. J. Paul, Simulation Assessment of Inter-Organisational Business Process Re-engineering Initiatives. InProceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation, Gaming, Training and Business Process Reengineering in Operations, 1996.

  52. G. M. Giaglis, R. J. Paul, G. I. Doukidis, Simulation for Intra- and Inter-Organisational Business Process Modelling,Informatica, 21(4): 613–620, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  53. P. Rittgen, Deriving Simulation Models from Business Process Models,INFOCOMP Journal, 4(3): 23–31, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  54. S. Artyshchev, H. Weigand, Contract-Based Interoperability for E-Business Transactions. InInteroperability of Enterprise Software and Applications, D. Konstantas, J.-P. Bourrières, M. Léonard, N. Boudjlida (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Z. Milosevic, P. F. Linington, S. Gibson, S. Kulkarni, J. Cole, Inter-organisational collaborations supported by E-Contracts. InProceedings of the IFIP 18th World Computer Congress “Building the E-Service Society: ECommerce, E-Business, and E-Government”, W. Lamersdorf, V. Tschammer, S. Amarger (Eds.), 2004.

  56. H. Weigand, L. Xu, Contracts in E-Commerce. InProceedings of the Ninth IFIP TC2/WG2.6 Working Conference on Database Semantics “Semantic Issues in E-Commerce Systems”, R. Meersman, K. Aberer, T. S. Dillon (Eds.), 2003.

  57. P. v. Bommel, S. J. B. A. Hoppenbrouwers, H. A. E. Proper, T. P. v. d. Weide, Exploring Modelling Strategies in a Meta-modelling Context. InOn the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops — OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWESOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SebGIS, Proceedings, Part II, Montpellier, France, Vol. 4278 R. Meersman, Z. Tari, P. Herrero (Eds.), pages 1128–1137, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  58. P. J. M. Frederiks, T. P. v. d. Weide, Information Modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants,Data & Knowledge Engineering, 58(1): 4–20, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. S. J. B. A. Hoppenbrouwers, L. Lindeman, H. A. Proper, Capturing Modeling Processes — Towards the MoDial Modeling Laboratory. InOn the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops — OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWESOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SebGIS, Proceedings, Part II, Montpellier, France, Vol. 4278 R. Meersman, Z. Tari, P. Herrero (Eds.), pages 1242–1252, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  60. S. J. B. A. Hoppenbrouwers, H. A. Proper, T. P. v. d. Weide, Formal Modelling as a Grounded Conversation. InProceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP`05), Kiruna, Sweden, G. Goldkuhl, M. Lind, S. Haraldson (Eds.), pages 139–155, Linköpings Universitet and Högskolan i Borås, Linköping and Borås, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  61. A. Persson, Enterprise Modelling in Practice: Situational Factors and their Influence on Adopting a Participative Approach. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, 2001.

  62. H. Weigand, W. J. A. M. van den Heuvel, Cross-organizational workflow integration using contracts,Decision Support Systems, 33(3): 247–265, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. M. Shen, D.-R. Liu, Coordinating Interorganizational Workflows based on Process-Views. InProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’01), Vol. 2113, pages 274–283, Springer, Berlin, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Informatics, University College of Borås, 501 90, Borås, Sweden

    Peter Rittgen

Authors
  1. Peter Rittgen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rittgen, P. Negotiating and enacting contracts for business networks. J Braz Comp Soc 13, 7–26 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192542

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192542

Keywords