Skip to main content

The Brazilian digital television system access device architecture


In early 2003, the Brazilian government accelerated the decision process on analog to digital transition of terrestrial TV broadcast infrastructure, naming this initiative The Brazilian Digital Television System (SBTVD). This paper describes the access device architecture we have proposed for the SBTVD, as well as related issues. We focused on several requirements among which: flexibility to support the social economical diversity enabling market implementations that can vary on cost, complexity and applications; digital inclusion targeting a minimal cost architecture providing a simple access device to information and services by convergent broadcast and point-to-point telecommunication means; and scalability targets incorporating state-of-the-art technology, considering emerging services and the current legacy analog TV infrastructure available in Brazil. We cover the following specific topics: an architecture overview considering scalability, interoperability and regional and international requirements, operating system and middleware interfaces, audio and video coding formats and associate standards, technical and economical analysis, usability and user interface consistency. Finally two prototypes for the outlined access device architecture are reported.


  1. [1]

    Y. Wu, S. Hirakawa, U. H. Reimers, J. Whitaker. Overview of digital television development worldwide. InProceedings of the IEEE. 94(1): 8-21, Jan. 2006.

  2. [2]

    P. Woolich. The digital hubbub.IEEE Spectrum. Pages: 26-32, Jan. 2002.

  3. [3]

    G. Bedicks Jr., F. Yamada, F. Sukys, C. E. S. Dantas, L. T. M. Raunheitte, C. Akamine. Results of the ISDB-T system tests, as part of digital TV study carried out in Brazil. InIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting. 52(1): 38– 44, March. 2006.

  4. [4]

    G. Bedicks Jr., F. Yamada, F. Sukys, C. E. S. Dantas, L. T. M. Raunheitte, C. Akamine. Digital Signal Disturbed by Impulsive Noise. InIEEE Transactions On Broadcasting. 51(3): 322–328, Sep. 2005.

  5. [5]

    T. Yoshimura. Conditional Access System for Digital Broadcasting in Japan. InProceedings of the IEEE. 94(1): 318–322, Jan. 2006.

  6. [6]

    M. Sakurai. Digital Television Receiver for ISDB. InProceedings of the IEEE. 94(1): 323–326, Jan. 2006.

  7. [7]

    R. J. Crinon, D. Bhat, D. Catapano, G. Thomas, J. T. Van Loo, G. Bang. Data Broadcasting and Interactive Television.Proceedings of the IEEE. 94(1): 102–118, Jan. 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    R. A. Vaz, E. R. Carvalho, M. K. Zuffo. The convergence of diverse network technologies in only one step-top box (for the future Brazilian scene). InIEEE Broadcast Symposium, 56, Washington DC. New York, 2006.

  9. [9]

    Y. Wu, E. Pliszka, B. Caron, P. Bouchard, G. Chouinard. Comparison of terrestrial DTV transmission systems: The ATSC 8-VSB, the DVB-T COFDM, and ISDB-T BST-OFDM. InIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting. 46(2), Jun. 2000.

  10. [10]

    ARIB STD-B31 V. 1.2,Transmission system for digital terrestrial television broadcasting ARIB standard, Association of Radio Industries and Businesses, Jan. 24, 2002.

  11. [11]

    Presidential Act 4901: The SBTVD Launch, 26th November 2003, available on line, in Portuguese.

  12. [12]

    Presidential Act 5820 The SBTVD Decision, 29th July 2006, available on line, in Portuguese.

  13. [13]

    ANATEL. National Agency of Telecommunication. On line: Last access in January 2007.

  14. [14]

    ABINEE, Brazilian Electrical and Electronics Industry Association. On line: Last access in January 2007.

  15. [15]

    S. Chen Niu. A stochastic formulation of the Bass model of new-product diffusion. InReview of Marketing Science Working Papers. 1(4): Working Paper 1, 2002.

  16. [16]

    F. M. Bass. A new product growth for model consumer durables. InManagement Sci. 15:215-227, 1969.

  17. [17]

    ITU-R BS.775-1.Multichannel stereophonic sound system with and without accompanying picture. 1994 (ver. 2002)

  18. [18]

    R. R. A. Faria, et al. Objective evaluation of audio compression standards and tools for digital TV applications.56th Annual IEEE Broadcast Symposium. Proceedings. Washington, 2006.

  19. [19]

    ISO/IEC 14496-3 (2005):Information technology — Coding of audio-visual objects — Part 3: Audio. ISO, 2005.

  20. [20]

    S. Bonnici. Which channel is that on?: A design model for electronic programme guides. InProceedings of the 1st European Conference on Interactive Television: from Viewers to Actors.

  21. [21]

    J. Carey. An Ethnographic Study of Interactive Television.Conference On Interactive Television. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh, 1996.

  22. [22]

    A. Dix, J. E. Finlay, G. D. Abowd, R. Beale. Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, 1998.

  23. [23]

    S. M. Drucker, A. Glatzer, S. De Mar, C. Wong. SmartSkip: consumer level browsing and skipping of digital video content. InCHI ’02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM Press: 219–226, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    J. Freeman, J. Lessiter. ITC-UsE: Ease of Use and Knowledge of Digital and Interactive Television: Results. London: University of London, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    J. Freeman, J. Lessiter. Easy TV 2002 Research Report. London: University of London, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    M. Gawlinski. Interactive Television Production. Focal Press: 288, 2003.

  27. [27]

    A. Hedman. A Media Rich Interface vs A Simple Interface for Interactive Television. InProceedings of E-Learn 2002 World Conference. Montreal, Canada, 2002.

  28. [28]

    J. Klein, S. Karger, K. Sinclair. Digital Television For All: A report on usability and accessible design. Cambridge, UK: The Generics Group, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  29. [29]

    T. Koltringer, M. Tomitsch, K. Kappel, D. Kalbeck. Implications for Designing the User Experience of DVD Menus. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press: 1565–1568, 2005.

  30. [30]

    J. Nielsen. Coordinating UI for Consistency. Morgan Kaufmann: 156, 2002.

  31. [31]

    C. Quico, M. J. Damásio. Televisão Digital e Interactiva: a modelação social como variável na avaliação de usabilidade. InOficina TV Interativa IHC 2004. Curitiba, Brasil, 2004.

  32. [32]

    B. Shneiderman. Designing The User Interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison Wesley, 1998.

  33. [33]

    D. D. Spinellis. The Information Furnace: Consolidated Home Control. InPersonal Ubiquit. Comput. No. 7: 53–69, Londres, Springer-Verlag, 2003.

  34. [34]

    J. P. Evain, H. Murret-Labarthe. TV- Anytime Phase 1 — A Decisive Milestone In Open Standardisation For Personal Video Recorders. In

  35. [35]

    S. Berkovits, S. Chokhani, J. A. Furlong, J. A. Geiter, J. C. Guild. Public Key Infrastructure Study: Final Report. Produced by theMITRE Corporation for NIST, April 1994.

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Carvalho, E.R., de Barros, G.G., de Paula Costa, L.C. et al. The Brazilian digital television system access device architecture. J Braz Comp Soc 13, 95–113 (2007).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • interactive Digital TV (iDTV)
  • The Brazilian Digital Television System (SBTVD)
  • Access Device Architecture
  • digital broadcasting
  • digital television (DTV)
  • high definition TV (HDTV)
  • Digital Television Services
  • audio and video coding