Skip to main content

Using a Functional Ontology Of Reputation to interoperate different agent reputation models

Abstract

This paper presents a Functional Ontology of Reputation that could be used as a common shared reputation knowledge by agents. Although there is a huge work on agent reputation, each research defines its own basic concepts. Sometimes different meanings are associated to the same term and in other occasions the same meaning is related to different terms. We claim that the reputation knowledge structured as an ontology could be used to enable the semantic integration level involved in the interoperation of software agents using different reputation models. We have illustrated this idea by showing a semantic mapping for the reputation concepts used in three distinct reputation models. That mapping shows how this ontology could act as a common global ontology that supports the semantic integration among these models.

References

  1. T. Berners-Lee; J. Hendler; O. Lassila. The Semantic Web. In:Scientific American, v. 284, n. 5, p. 28–37, 2001.

  2. O. Boissier ; Y. Demazeau. An architecture for social and individual control and its application to computer vision. In: Y. Demazeau; J.-P. Muller; J. Perram. (Ed.).Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, Odense, Denmark: or][s.n.], p. 107–118, 1994.

  3. R. H. Bordini, J. F. Hübner.Jason: A Java-based agent speak interpreter used with saci for multi-agent distribution over the net, Available:http:// jason.sourceforge.net/.2004

  4. J.A. Breuker; A. Valente; R. Winkels. Legal ontologies: a functional view. In: P.R.S. Visser and R. Winkels, editors,Legal Ontologies, p. 23–36. ACM, New York. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Breuker. Constructing a legal core ontology: LRICore. In:XVII Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (SBIA). Workshop on Ontologies and their applications. São luiz do Maranhão, Brazil, 2004.

  6. D. B. Bromley.Reputation, Image and Impression Management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. England, 1993.

  7. S. Casare; J. S. Sichman. Towards a Functional Ontology of Reputation. In:Proceedings of 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), 2005.

  8. C. Castelfranchi; R. Conte; M. Paolucci. Normative reputation and the costs of compliance. In:Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 1, no. 3, 1998.

  9. C. Castelfranchi; R. Falcone; G. Pezzulo. Trust in Information Sources as a Source for Trust: A Fuzzy Approach. In:Proceedings of 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS’03), July 14–18, Melbourne, Australia, p. 89–96, 2003.

  10. R. Conte; M. Paolucci.Reputation in Artificial Societies: Social Beliefs for Social Order. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

  11. M. Dean; G. Schreiber. Editors. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available in: http://www.w3.org/TR/ 2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/

  12. G. Ferris; F. Blass; C. Douglas; R. Kolodinsky; D. Treadway. Personal Reputation in Organizations. In: Greenberg, Jerald,Organizational Behavior- The State of the Science. LEA. New Jersey, p. 211–246, 2003.

  13. FIPA00001. 2000. FIPA Abstract Architecture Specification. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. Available: http://www.fipa.org/specs/ fipa00001/.

  14. K. Fullam; T. B. Klos; G. Muller; J. Sabater; A. Schlosser; Z. Topol; S. Barber; J. S. Rosenschein; L. Vercouter; M. Voss. A specification of the Agent Reputation and Trust (ART) Testbed: Experimentation and Competition for Trust in Agent Societies. In:Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), p. 512–518, 2005.

  15. T. R. Gruber. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In: Nicola Guarino and Roberto Poli, editors,Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994

  16. N. Guarino. Formal Ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. In:International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 43(5/6), p. 625–640, 1995.

  17. V. Haarslev; R. Moller. Racer: A core inference engine for the Semantic Web. In: 2ndInternational Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON-2003), Sanibel Island, FL, 2003.

  18. K. Knublauch; M. A. Musen; A. L. Rector. Editing Description Logic Ontologies with the Protégé OWL Plugin. In: International Workshop on Description Logics — DL2004,Whistler, BC, Canada, 2004.

  19. Y. Labrou; T. Finin; Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: the current landscape.In: IEEE Intelligent Systems, v. 14, n. 2, p. 45–52, March/April, 1999.

  20. E. Mena; V. Kashyap; A. P. Sheth; A. Illarramendi. OBSERVER: An Approach for Query Processing in Global Information Systems based on Interoperation across Preexisting Ontologies. In:Proceeding of the Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, p. 14–25,1996.

  21. L. Mui; A. Halberstadt; M. Mohtashemi. Notions of Reputation in Multi-Agents Systems: A Review. In:Proceedings of 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy, 2002.

  22. N. Noy; M. Musen. PROMPT: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. InSeventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), Austin, TX, 2000.

  23. N. Noy; M. Musen. Using PROMPT Ontology-Comparison Tools in the EON Ontology Alignment Contest. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology based Tools (EON 2004), 2003.

  24. A. S. Rao; M. P. Georgeff. BDI agents: from theory to practice. In: LESSER, V. (Ed.). International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS’95), 1, San Francisco, USA, p. 312–319, 1995.

  25. J. Sabater; C. Sierra. Reputation and Social Network Analysis in Multi-Agent Systems. In:Proceedings of the first international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS-02), Bologna, Italy. pp.475–482, 2002.

  26. J. Sabater; C. Sierra. Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models. In:Artificial Intelligence Review, vol 24, n. 1, 2005.

  27. J. Sabater. Trust and reputation for agent societies. PhD Thesis. Institut d’Investigacion en Intelligencia Artificial, Spain, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Uschold; M. Gruninger. Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. In:Knowledge Engineering Review, v. 11, No. 2, June 1996.

  29. A. Valente. Legal Knowledge Engineering — A modeling Approach. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1995.

  30. U. Visser; H. Stuckenschmidt; H. Wache; Thomas Vogele. Enabling technologies for interoperability. In: In U. Visser and H. Pundt, Editors,Workshop on the 14th International Symposium of Computer Science for Environmental Protection, p. 35–46, Bonn, Germany, 2000.

  31. B. Yu; M. P. Singh. An Evidential Model of Distributed Reputation Management. In:Proceedings of 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy, 2002.

  32. G. Zacharia; P. Maes. Trust Management Through Reputation Mechanisms. In:Applied Artificial Intelligence, 14((9), Special Issue on Trust, Deception and Fraud in Agent Societies, p. 881–907, 2000.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casare, S., Sichman, J.S. Using a Functional Ontology Of Reputation to interoperate different agent reputation models. J Braz Comp Soc 11, 79–94 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192377

Keywords

  • Reputation
  • Ontology
  • Interoperability
  • Multi-Agent Systems