Skip to main content
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society
Download PDF

Ontology Issues and Applications Guest Editors’ Introduction

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society volume 11, pages 5–16 (2005)Cite this article

References

  1. Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kuhn, O. & Sintek, M. 1998. “Toward a technology for organizational memories”, IEEE Intelligent Systems 13(3), 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arens, Y., Hsu, C.-N., and Knoblock, C. A. 1996. Query processing in the SIMS information mediator?. In Advanced Planning Technology. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arpírez, J. C., Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A. 2003. WebODE in a Nutshell. Artificial Intelligence Magazine. Volume 24, no. 3, Fall, American Association for Artificial Intelligence Press. 37–47. Menlo Park, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berland, M. and Charniak, E. 1999. Finding Parts in Very Large Corpora. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the ACL.

  5. Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Magnini, B. 2005. Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications. IOS Press.

  6. Cimiano, P., Hotho, A., Staab, S. 2005. Learning Concept Hierarchies from Text Corpora using Formal Concept Anaylsis Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 24: 305–339. August 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Craven, M., McCallum, A., DiPasquo, D., Mitchell, T., Freitag, D., Nigam, K., Slattery, S. 1999. Learning to Extract Symbolic Knowledge from the World Wide Web. Technical Report CMU-CS-98-122. School of Computer Science. Carnegie Mellon University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Decker, S., Erdmann, M., Fensel, D., and Studer, R. 1999. Ontobroker: Ontology based access to distributed and semi-structured information. In R. Meersman et al., editor, Semantic Issues in Multimedia Systems. Proceedings of DS-8, pages 351–369. Kluwer, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeMarco, T. 1979. Structured Analysis and System Specification. Prentice-Hall.

  10. Dzbor, M. 1999. KNOWWEB research project and KNOWWEB toolkitkmi.open.ac.uk/people/dzbor/public/ knowweb1/KnowWebPaper.doc

  11. Ehrig, M. and Staab, S. 2004. QOM — Quick Ontology Mapping. In 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), Hiroshima, Japan.

  12. Faure, D. and Nedellec, C. (1998). ASIUM:learning subcategorization frames and restrictions of selection. In Kodratoff, Y., editor, Proceedings of Workshop on Text Mining, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML 98).

  13. Freitas, F., Bittencourt, G 2003 An Ontology-based Architecture for Cooperative Information Agents. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’2003), Acapulco, Mexico.

  14. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., and Oltramari, A. 2003. Sweetening wordnet with DOLCE. AI Magazine, 24(3):13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garcia-Molina, H., Papakonstantinou, Y., Quass, D.,Rajaraman, A., Sagiv, Y., Ullman, J., and Widom, J. 1995. The TSIMMIS approach to mediation: Data models and languages. In Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems (NGITS-95), Naharia, Israel.

  16. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., and Yatskevich, M. 2004. Semantic matching. In 1st European semantic web symposium (ESWS’04), pages 61–75, Heraklion, Greece.

  17. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O. 2004. Ontological Engineering, Springer Verlag, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gruber, T. 1995. Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 43(5/6): 907–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gruber, T. 1996. Ontolingua: A mechanism to support portable ontologies. Technical report KSL-91-66. Stanford University, Knowledge Systems Laboratory. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grüninger, M. and Kopena, J. 2005. Semantic Integration through Invariants. AI Magazine 26(1): 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guarino, N. 1996. Understanding, Building, And Using Ontologies. Proceedings of 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Worskhop. Banff, Canada.

  22. Guarino, N. Welty, C. 2002. Evaluating Ontological decisions with OntoClean. Comm.of The ACM(2):61–65

    Google Scholar 

  23. Handschuh, S. Staab, S. (eds.). 2003. Annotation for the Semantic Web. IOS Press, Netherlands.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hearst, M. 1992. Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms in Large Text Corpora. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics.

  25. Heflin, J., Hendler, J., and Luke, S. 1999. SHOE: A knowledge representation language for internet applications. Technical Report CS-TR-4078, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland.

  26. Hovy, E. 1998. Combining and standardizing largescale, practical ontologies for machine translation and other uses. In The First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 535–542, Granada, Spain.

  27. Kalfoglou, Y. and Schorlemmer, M. 2003. Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(1):1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuper, J., Saggion, J., Cunningham, H. Declerck, T., de Jong, T., Reidsma, D., Wilks, Y. Wittenburg, P. 2003. Intelligent Multimedia Indexing and Retrieval through Multi-source Information Extraction and Merging_ Proceedings of the International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’2003), Acapulco, Mexico.

  29. Lenat, D. 1990. Towards Programs with Common Sense. Communications of ACM. 33(8):30–49. USA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Levy, A., Rajaraman, A., and Ordille, J. J. 1996. Querying heterogeneous information sources using source descriptions. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB 1996.

  31. Maedche, A. and Staab., S. 2000. Discovering Conceptual Relations from Text. In Horn, W., editor, tProceedings of the Fourteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), pages 321–325, Berlin, Germany. IOS Press.

  32. Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L., Studer, R., Volz, R. 2003. Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management.IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 (2): 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McGuinness, D. L., Fikes, R., Rice, J., and Wilder, S. 2000. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Cohn, A. G., Giunchiglia, F., and Selman, B., editors, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference (KR2000). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., and Rahm, E. 2002. Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In 18th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE-2002), San Jose, California. IEEE Computing Society.

  35. Mena, E. and Illarramendi, A. 2001.Ontology-Based Query Processing for Global Information Systems. Kluwer.

  36. Miller, G. 1995. WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM. 38(11):39–41. USA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G., and Kersten, M. 2000. A graph-oriented model for articulation of ontology interdependencies. In Proceedings Conference on Extending Database Technology 2000 (EDBT’2000), Konstanz, Germany.

  38. Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T.R., Patil, R., Senator, T., Swartout, W. 1991. Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing. Artificial Intelligence Magazine. 12(3), American Association for Artificial Intelligence Press. 36–56. Menlo Park, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nédellec, C.. 1999. Corpus-based learning of semantic relations by the ILP system, Asium. In James Cussens, editor, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Learning Language in Logic, pages 28–39, Bled, Slovenia.

  40. Niles, I. and Pease, A. 2001. Towards a standard upper ontology. In The 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS-2001), Ogunquit, Maine.

  41. Noy, N. 1997. Knowledge Representation for Intelligent Information Retrieval in Experimental Sciences. PhD Thesis. Computer Science Faculty, Northeastern University of Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Noy, N. F. and Musen, M. A. 2003. The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6):983–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Noy, N., Fergerson, R., Musen., M. 2000. The knowledge model of Protege-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. 2th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW’2000), Juan-les-Pins, France

  44. O’Leary, D. 1998. Knowledge Management Systems: Converting and Connecting. IEEE Intelligent Systems 13(3), 30–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ontoprise produkts. 2003.www.ontoprise.de/ produkts

  46. Rapoza, J. 2000. DAML could take search to a new level. PC Week, February 7,2000. USA.

  47. Robin, J., Ramalho, F. 2001 Empirically evaluating WordNet-based query expansion in a web search engine setting. Proceedings of IR’2001, September 19–21, Oulu, Finland,.

  48. Shortliffe, E. 1976. Computer-based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. Elsevier, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sowa, J. 1999. Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical and computational foundations. Brooks Cole Pub. Co. Pacific Grove, USA

    Google Scholar 

  50. Studer, R., Benjamins, R., Fensel, D. 1998. Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 25(1998):161–197.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Studer, R., Volz, R. 2003. Ontologies:Representation, Engineering, Learning & Applications, Tutorial slides. 3rd IFIP Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government (I3E’03) September 21st. Sao Paulo, Brazil

  52. Swartout, B., Patil, R., Knight, K., and Russ, T. 1996. Toward distributed use of large-scale. ontologies. Proceedings of 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Worskhop. Banff, Canada.

  53. Sycara, K. 1999. In-context information management through adaptative collaboration of intelligent agents. In: Klusch, M. (sd.) Intelligent nformation Agents, Springer Verlag, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  54. Uschold, M. and Gruniger, M. 1996. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2):93–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Informática, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Cidade Universitária, Caixa Postal 7851, 50732-970, Recife, PE, Brazil

    Fred Freitas

  2. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Heiner Stuckenschmidt

  3. Stanford Medical Informatics, 251 Campus Drive, 94305-5479, Sanford, CA, USA

    Natalya F. Noy

Authors
  1. Fred Freitas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heiner Stuckenschmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalya F. Noy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freitas, F., Stuckenschmidt, H. & Noy, N.F. Ontology Issues and Applications Guest Editors’ Introduction. J Braz Comp Soc 11, 5–16 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192372

Keywords