Skip to main content

Letter from the guest editors

Agents organizations: A concise overview

References

  1. 1._G. Abdelkader. Requirements for achieving software agents autonomy and defining their responsibility. InProceedings of the AAMAS-03 Work7 shop on Autonomy, Delegation, and Control: From Inter-agent to Organizations and Institutions. Melbourne, Australia, 2003.

  2. 2._O. Boissier and Y. Demazeau. ASIC: an architecture for social and individual control and its application to computer vision.. In J. Perram, and J. P. Müller, editors,Applications of Multi-Agent Systems — Proceedings of MAAMAW 1994, LNAI series, vol. 1069, pg. 135–149. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3._C. Castelfranchi, M. Micelli and A. Cesta. Dependence relations among autonomous agents. In E. Werner and Y. Demazeau, editors,Decentralized AI 3, pg. 215–227. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4._R. Conte and M. Paolucci.Reputation in artificial societies: social beliefs for social order. Kluwer Academic Publisherrs, Amsterdam, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5._R. Conte, C. Castelfranchi and F. Dignum. Autonomous Norm Acceptance. In J. P.Mueller, M. P. Singh, and A. S. Rao, editors,Intelligent Agents V, LNAI series, vol. 1555, pg. 45–60. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6._V. Dignum.A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic. SIKS Dissertation Series 2004-1. 270 pages. SIKS, Amsterdam, 2004. PhD Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7._V. Dignum and F. Dignum. Modeling agent societies: coordination frameworks and institutions. In P. Brazdil and A. Jorge, editors,Progress in Artificial Intelligence — Proceedings of APIA 2001, LNAI series, vol. 2258, pg. 191–204. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8._M. Esteva, J. Padget, and C. Sierra. Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In J.-J.CH. Meyer and M. Tambe, editors,Intelligent Agents VIII, LNAI series, vol. 2333, pg. 348–366. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. 9._J. Ferber and O. Gutknecht. A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multiagents systems. In Yves Demazeau, editor,Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), pg. 128–135. IEEE Press, Washington, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. 10._M. Fox, M. Barbuceanu, M. Gruninger, and J. Lon. An organizational ontology for enterprise modeling. In M. Prietula, K. Carley, and L. Gasser, editors,Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups, chapter 7, pg. 131–152. AAAI Press / MIT Press, Menlo Park, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11._M. Hannoun, O. Boissier, J. S. Sichman, and C. Sayettat. MOISE: An organizational model for multiagent systems. In M. C. Monard and J. Sichman, editors,Advances in Artificial Intelligence — Proceedings of IBERAMIA/SBIA 2000, LNAI series, vol. 1952, pg. 152–161. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12._J. F. Hübner, J. S. Sichman and O. Boissier. Using the MOISE+ for a cooperative framework of MAS reorganization. In A. Bazzan and S. Labidi, editors,Advances in Artificial Intelligence — Proceedings of SBIA 2004, LNAI series, vol. 3171, pg. 506–515. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2004.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. 13._J. F. Hübner, J. S. Sichman and O. Boissier. A model for the structural, functional and deontic specification of a MAS organization. In G. Bittencourt and G. Ramalho, editors,Advances in Artificial Intelligence — Proceedings of SBIA 2002, LNAI series, vol. 2507, pg. 118–128. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14._C. Lemaître and C. Excelente. Multi-agent organization approach. In F. Garijo and C. Lemaître, editors,Proceedings of the II Ibero-american Workshop on DAI and MAS, pg. 7–16. Toledo, Spain, 1998.

  15. 15._V. Parunak and J. Odell. Representing social structures in UML. In M. Wooldridge, G. Weiss, and P. Ciancarini, editors,Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II, LNCS series, vol. 2222, pg. 1–16. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. 16._M. Prasad, K. Decker, A. Garvey, and V. Lesser. Exploring organizational design with TÆMS: a case study of distributed data processing. In ToruIshida, editor,Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1996), pages 283–290. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17._J. Sabater and C. Sierra. Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In C.Castelfranchi and W. L. Johnson, editors,Proceedings of the 1 st. International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pg. 475–482. ACM Press, New York, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. 18._J. S. Sichman.Raciocínio social e organizacional em sistemas multiagentes: avanços e perspectivas. 235 pages. Escola Politécnica da USP, São Paulo, 2003. Associate Professorship Thesis (In Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19._J. S. Sichman, R. Conte, Y. Demazeau and C. Castelfranchi. A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In Tony Cohn, editor,Proceedings of the 11 th. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1994), pg. 188–192. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20. Y. So and E. Durfee. An organizational self-design model for organizational change. InProceedings of the AAAI-93 Workshop on AI and Theories of Groups and Organizations: Conceptual and Empirical Research, pg. 8–15. Washington, USA, 1993.

  21. 21._M. Tambe and W. Zhang, W. Towards flexible teamwork in persistent teams. In Yves Demazeau, editor,Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), pg. 277–284. IEEE Press, Washington, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. 22. G. Weiß.Some studies in distributed machine learning and organizational design. Technical Report FKI-189-94, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, 1994.

  23. 23._M. Wooldridge, N.R. Jennings and D. Kinny. The GAIA methodology for agent oriented analysis and design.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(3):285–312, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24._F. Zambonelli. Abstractions and infrastructures for the design and development of mobile agent organizations. In M. Wooldridge, G. Weiss, and P. Ciancarini, editors,Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II, LNCS series, vol. 2222, pg. 245–262. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. 25._F. Zambonelli, N. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. Organizational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi- agent systems. In P. Ciancarini and M. Wooldridge, editors,Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, LNCS series, vol. 1957, pg. 98–114. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sichman, J.S., Dignum, V. & Castelfranchi, C. Letter from the guest editors. J Braz Comp Soc 11, 3–8 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192367

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192367