A survey on automatic techniques for enhancement and analysis of digital photography

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Table 3 Summary of the reviewed work on enhancement techniques.

Authors	Image sources	Set size	Main goal	Assess. method:	Results
				used metrics
Byers [13]	Own	3,008	In-camera photo composition	Sub.: user selection	35 %
Tian et al. [149]	Own	1,627	Photo Collage	Sub.: professional	Most results considered good
Liu et al. [87]	Web	900	Recomposition	Sub.: forced choice	93.7 %
Bhattacharya et al. [7]	Web	632	Recomposition	Sub.: forced choice	93.7 %
Yin et al. [179]	Own	600	Media Adaptation	NI	NI
Suh et al. [147]	Corbis [31]	150	Cropping	Sub.: recognition time	Faster using the approach
Zhang et al. [186]	Own	100	Cropping	Sub.: scaled	41 %
Chen et al. [24]	Web	56	Recomposition	Sub.: scaled	71.28 %
Santella et al. [133]	NI	50	Cropping	Sub.: forced choice	58.4 %
Setlur et al. [138]	NI	40	Retargeting	Sub.: forced choice	89.1 %
Achanta et al. [1]	Berkeley [100] and MSRA [89]	NI	Retargeting	NI	NI
Banerjee et al. [4]	NI	NI	Recomposition	NI	NI
Lim et al. [86]	NI	NI	Composite	NI	NI